Data · Pricing index
GEO tool pricing, compared
Every GEO / AI-visibility tool I cover, in one sortable, filterable table: entry price, engines covered, free trials and seats. Hand-verified, kept current. Prices verified October 17, 2026.
Some links here are affiliate links: if you buy through them I may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. I only recommend tools I'd point a colleague to, and rankings are never paid for.
How complete is this index?8 of 22 · 36%
I track which tools ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity actually name, and that data is published in the citation tracker. This is how much of that roster the index below covers. Stating the gap seems more useful than pretending there isn’t one.
Not yet covered (14): Ahrefs Brand Radar, BotRank, Brand24, BrandViz.AI, Brandi AI, BrightEdge, Gauge, Geoptie, Goodie AI, HubSpot AEO Grader, RankScope, SE Ranking, Semrush AI Toolkit, Trakkr.ai. These are the research queue. Each needs its pricing read off the vendor’s own page before it goes in, which is why the list shrinks slowly rather than all at once.
Covered here but not yet named by any engine (4): Airefs, LLM Pulse, Morningscore, Semrush AI Visibility + SEO. Being absent from an AI answer is not a verdict on a tool; it usually means fewer third-party roundups list it.
What changed recently52 checks · 26 moved
Every re-check is logged here with its date, including the ones that found nothing had moved. That is deliberate: a price list that only publishes changes can’t tell you whether silence means “stable” or “nobody looked”.
- Airefs
$24 / $49 / $83→ $29 / $59 / $99vendor page (fetched)Fetch read of getairefs.com/pricing: compare table monthly $29 / $59 / $99, yearly $288 / $588 / $996; 25 / 60 / 150 prompts; Lite refresh every other day, Pro and Expert daily. The Agency card ($83) disagrees with its compare column (From $59 monthly); unresolved. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- AthenaHQunchanged at Free / $295 / customvendor page (fetched)
Fetch read of athenahq.ai/pricing: Essential free (300 credits), Starter $295/month (3,600 credits, 1 credit = 1 AI response, 11 models); add-ons quote only. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- LLM Pulse
€49 / €99 / €299→ EUR 49 / 99 / 299 weeklyvendor page (fetched)Fetch read of llmpulse.ai/pricing: EUR weekly 49 / 99 / 299 / 599 / 1,199, ex VAT; limits 50 / 150 / 450 / 1,200 / 2,400 prompts. Daily EUR and Partner-tier EUR figures are not printed in the fetched text. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- Morningscore
$69 / $159 / $299→ $69 / $99 / $159 / $299vendor page (fetched)Fetch read of morningscore.io/pricing: Lite $69, Business $99, Pro $159, Premium $299 per month; 100 / 1,000 / 5,000 / 20,000 AI credits. No credit-to-prompt conversion on the page. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- Otterly.AIunchanged at $29 / $189 / $489vendor page (fetched)
Fetch read of otterly.ai/pricing: Lite $29, Standard $189, Premium $489 per month, annual tab $25 / $160 / $422; 15 / 100 / 400 prompts; extra 100 prompts $99 monthly; Enterprise custom. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- Peec AI
€85 / €205 / €425 monthly (Brand, EUR)→ $95 / $245 / $495 (US proxy)vendor page (fetched)Fetch read of peec.ai/pricing from a US proxy: $95 / $245 / $495 monthly, 50 / 150 / 350 prompts, choose 3 models; extra model $30 / $70 / $140 with unclear basis. The plan table lists Naver AI while the add-on list lists Perplexity: pool conflict persists. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- RankScale
$20 / $99 / $780→ $99 / $229 / $385 / $780vendor page (fetched)Fetch read of rankscale.ai/pricing: Pro $99 (1,200 credits), Pro+ $229 (3,000), Growth $385 (5,500), Enterprise $780 (12,000); credit rule typically 0.25 per engine per prompt. Essentials limits not readable. Fetch read from a US-based proxy (USD shown; EUR view not tested). Raw text saved under research/. Handoff status of the 2026-10-06 rows is unchanged.
- RankScale
$99 / $229 / $385 / $780→ $17 yearly only / $99 / $229 / $385 / $780vendor, directSource: Marco's own read in his browser of rankscale.ai/pricing on 2026-10-17, from Italy (euro symbols shown; a US proxy fetch the same day showed dollar symbols with the same numbers). Currency unconfirmed: not converted. "Starting at" row: Essentials 20 struck through and 17/mo "Yearly only"; Pro 99/mo; Pro+ 229/mo; Growth 385/mo; Enterprise 780/mo. Buttons: Get Essentials, Try Pro for Free, Get Pro+, Get Growth, Get Enterprise. The cheapest month-to-month plan is Pro at 99. Supersedes the 2026-07-12 $20 entry, which was wrong either way.
| AI engines (entry) | Seats | Visit | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RankScaleThe coverage pickVerified October 17, 2026 · vendor-confirmedPlan terms September 6, 2026 | From $17/mo$204/yrannual ratecredits | 17+, all included on every plan | 7-day | Unlimited (Pro+) | Visit Review |
| Otterly.AIThe clean budget entryVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms September 6, 2026 | From $29/mo~$290/yrmonth-to-monthflat | 4 core; Claude, Gemini & Google AI Mode are paid add-ons | Free trial | Unlimited | Visit Review |
| AirefsThe cheapest way inVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms September 5, 2026 | From $24/mo$288/yrannual rateflat | ChatGPT-focused; Google AI Overviews is a paid add-on ($10–$30/mo by tier) | 7-day | Small-team | Visit |
| MorningscoreThe friendly all-in-oneVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms September 6, 2026 | From $69/mo~$690/yrmonth-to-monthflat | Light GEO layer inside an SEO suite | 14-day (no card) | Per plan | Visit Review |
| WritesonicTrack, create & fix in oneVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms October 10, 2026 | From $79/mo$948/yrannual rateflat | Enterprise explicitly lists eight engines | 7-day (no card) | Per plan | Visit Review |
| LLM PulseThe transparent all-rounderVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms: handoff-sourced, not read by us | From €49/mo~€490/yrmonth-to-monthflat | 5 included engines; exact additional-engine prices are unresolved. €8 weekly applies to Naver/Baidu, not these other engines | 14-day (card) | Unlimited | Visit Review |
| Semrush AI Visibility + SEOBest inside the Semrush suiteVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms October 17, 2026 | From $99/mo~$990/yrmonth-to-monthflat | Standalone AI Visibility Base ($99/mo per domain, 25 custom prompts) tracks ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity; the SEO + AI Search bundles from $139 add SEO and scale prompts by tier | None | Per plan | Visit Review |
| Peec AIThe European choiceVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms: handoff-sourced, not read by us | $95/mo (US) · €85/mo (Italy)US connection, USD: monthly $95 / $245 / $495; annual billing $80 / $205 / $420 per monthItaly connection, EUR: monthly €85 / €205 / €425; annual billing €70 / €180 / €360 per monthAgency, EUR: Essential €205 monthly, €175 annual per month (10,000 credits); Growth €425 monthly, €365 annual per month (25,000 credits); Scale €675 monthly, €575 annual per month (65,000 credits); Comprehensive customgeo-priced, latest read October 13, 2026: EUR vendor-direct (Vincent, Peec, 2026-10-13); USD a separate geo read of the vendor page (2026-10-10)varies by locationannual rateflat | Choose three: exact selectable pool is conflicting. Required combinations and extra-model prices are not verified | Free trial | Unlimited | Visit |
| AthenaHQEvery engine on the entry planVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms September 6, 2026 | From $295/mo~$2,950/yrmonth-to-monthcredits | 10+, including Claude, Gemini and Grok on the paid entry plan | Free Essential tier (300 credits) | Team | Visit |
| Scrunch AICrawler analytics for agenciesVerified October 17, 2026Plan terms October 10, 2026 | From $250/mo~$2,500/yrmonth-to-monthflat | 4 engines on Core; 9 on Enterprise (adds Claude, Gemini, Meta AI, Google AI Mode, Grok). AI bot-traffic analytics is on Core | 7-day | 5 (Core) | Visit |
| ProfoundThe enterprise platformVerified October 10, 2026Plan terms October 10, 2026 | Free 7-day trial / customFree 7-day trial / customquote | The free trial tracks these three; up to 9 engines, Claude and Perplexity among them, on custom Enterprise | 7 days free: 50 prompts daily on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews | Enterprise | Visit |
| Bluefish AIEnterprise, invite-onlyVerified July 12, 2026 | Quote onlyQuote onlyquote | Enterprise; closed-pilot access | None | Enterprise | Visit |
No tools match those filters. Try widening them.
Every priced row states what its headline figure is, because they are not all the same kind of number. month-to-month is what you pay for one month. annual rate is the per-month price of a committed year, which is what several vendors show by default, so month one costs more than the sticker. Per-year figures follow from that: exact (×12) for a row already quoting the annual rate, and an estimate marked ~ (about two months free) for a month-to-month row, whose annual offer we have not read. A row marked basis unconfirmed has never been read at source and is left out of the per-year comparison rather than guessed into it. Billing model: flat = fixed tiers, credits = usage-based, quote = enterprise/quote-only. Currencies as the vendor lists them. Sorting and the budget filter use what month one costs, so an annual-rate row is compared on its real month-to-month price where the vendor publishes one.
Two dates per row, on purpose. Verified is when the price was last checked.Plan terms is when what the plan actually includes was last checked. They rot at different speeds and they used to share one date, which is how this index published four wrong claims about a tool whose price had been confirmed the day before. Claims that something is locked to a higher tier get the shortest leash of all, because vendors move features down the ladder to compete, so that kind of claim only ever goes wrong in the direction that makes a tool look worse than it is.
Read the full comparison with pros & cons →Weighing two tools? See the head-to-heads →Not sure which? Take the 60-second finder →